Author Emily Giffin Says Her ‘Unmaternal’ Meghan Markle Criticism Was ‘Just Mean’!

Emily Giffin understands her remarks about Meghan Markle were crass!

As we reported, the Something Borrowed author got extreme reaction last month when she called the 38- year-old Duchess of Sussex a “phony” and “unmaternal.” Now, weeks after providing a mildly-salty apology, the scribe confesses that she went method too far with her remarks.

Speaking to The AP, Emily stated:

“Well, you know, there’s one thing to have, you know, to in general have legitimate criticisms of people, but that’s a whole other thing. My comments were not legitimate. They were just mean, so that’s sort of two separate things.”

The author went on to describe that while it’s alright to slam superstars, there’s a distinction in between slamming and disliking.

Related: Harry & &(*********************************************************************** )(******************************************************************************************************** )(***************************** )(********************************************************************************* )(***************************************************************************** )Angeles!

She included:

“I mean, I do think it’s OK that there’s this whole idea of is it ever OK to criticize one another? You know, as women or as is people like should we just never get to criticize? And I think we can go too far with that. I don’t think we need to treat each other with kid gloves. Women treat each other as women with kid gloves, especially when criticized. Criticism is legitimate. But just that wasn’t the case with these comments.”

It definitely was not. (******************************************************************************************************* )we reported,Emily stimulated outrage with her commentary on a videoMeg andPrinceHarry shared revealing them checking out to their childArchie as they raised cash forSave theChildren

In the remarks area of an“unbiased”Markle account onInstagram, she composed:

“Adorable child and book. But …. Holy ‘me first.’ This is the Megan show. Why didn’t she film and let Harry read? And why didn’t she take the moment at the end to say ‘he said daddy!’ Because that would make it about Harry for a split second, God forbid… also, you want privacy for your child so you put out a video (by your authorized biographer) of him …. wearing no pants?! Ooookay….”

After drawing the ire of (*************************************************************************** )advocates, the author required to her own IG account to clarify, informing readers that her strong anti-(*********************************************************************** )take originated from her disagreeing with how the couple managed #Megxit

Video: Meghan Speaks On George Floyd’s Death & & BLM In Powerful Graduation Address

Making it clear that her remarks had absolutely nothing to do with the starlet’ race, Emily composed:

“To be clear, I absolutely loved that a biracial, American woman was marrying into the Royal Family. It seemed a wonderful, happy thing for everyone. I celebrated their wedding by hosting a gathering here at my home and posting many, many photos. Further, I was appalled by any signs of racism against her. Over recent months my feelings about BOTH Harry and Meghan changed. But I can say from the bottom of my heart that my criticism of Meghan has never had anything to do with her race… Further, I understood why she wanted to leave the monarchy and carve out her own path. I do, however, find fault with the way BOTH she and Harry handled things, and those feelings bled over in later posts, including the ones today. I can see how some of my posts may have felt mean-spirited, and could be construed as having racial undertones. It was not my intent, but I understand that intent and impact are two very different things. And I am truly sorry for that negative impact.”

Do U believe she discovered her lesson, Perezcious readers?

[Image via WENN]

Source link