The Particular One noticed the affect of a special Blues boss in Sunday’s end result, a declare that was refuted by the present coach
Tottenham supervisor Jose Mourinho took the bizarre step of praising an ex-Chelsea boss for spearheading the Blues’ victory over his facet on Sunday.
Mourinho tasted dwelling defeat for the primary time since taking on the Spurs job as considered one of his former employers triumphed 2-0.
Willian scored each the guests’ objectives within the opening 45 minutes, whereas Tottenham’s comeback efforts had been hamstrung by Heung-Min Son’s pink card late on.
Defeat leaves Spurs six factors adrift of their London rivals, who at the moment occupy the ultimate Champions League qualifying place.
And Mourinho was stuffed with reward for the tactical set-up within the Chelsea camp – though inspiration apparently got here from an surprising supply.
“They had been higher than us within the first half. It’s not troublesome for me to confess it. They performed in a system they’re very comfy with. A system they performed for 2 years with Antonio Conte. A number of their gamers are very comfy with it. Alonso, Azpilicueta, Kante, Willian, gamers very comfy on this system,” Mourinho instructed reporters after the sport.
“They created issues for us within the first half, not issues of clear scoring conditions however such as you say, with the management they’d. The sport was mainly in our half regardless of them not creating quite a bit. However in the long run you’re proper and it’s straightforward for me to confess they had been superior.
“However you look to the objectives and they don’t seem to be a consequence of any superiority.
“The primary objective is a brief nook with an enormous mistake. We all know how one can defend brief corners, we practice how one can cope with brief corners. The gamers concerned within the brief nook resolution weren’t centered. So that you concede a objective with a brief nook and also you concede a objective with a penalty. So the objectives did not come from that superiority, they got here from errors.
“Then within the second half we modified, we felt we wanted to vary and we had far more management and we had been in our greatest interval of the sport and one objective would change the emotion of the sport as a result of the sport on the pitch was already modified.
“Within the first half [the ball] was in our half and within the first 15-20 minutes of the second half we had been far more of their half, the sport modified.
“We had been searching for a objective and as a substitute of a objective comes a pink card. Then the sport clearly is straightforward for them to regulate with gamers technically good and one participant extra. Then it was harder.”
Unsurprisingly, Chelsea boss Frank Lampard didn’t agree with Mourinho’s analysis, arguing that he deserved credit score for nullifying free-scoring Spurs.
“Conte’s system? No, it didn’t issue in any respect. I don’t know if I wish to undergo all of the gamers, however I’m positive half of the gamers on the pitch weren’t there,” he instructed reporters.
Article continues beneath
“I do know Tomori wasn’t, Mason Mount wasn’t, Tammy Abraham. I’m not making an attempt to clone anybody’s system. Actually, I believe Conte’s system was an unbelievable one which received the league with Chelsea.
“The way in which we play and the message I give is completely different. It’s not as easy that if you happen to play 4-3-Three that you’re cloning another person, in any other case you’re all cloning one another. It was extra, ‘Can this be a system that helps us defensively and offensively towards Tottenham?’
“The way in which they play. That was my option to play it, not whether or not gamers perceive it. Having stated that the gamers took the plan on extremely nicely.”