Massachusetts governor signs bill allowing all voters to vote by mail

The new law means Massachusetts joins other states — including Michigan, Nevada, California, New Hampshire and Wisconsin — in moving to make it easier for more individuals to vote by mail as coronavirus infection numbers climb and states are forced to look ahead to the November election.

The bill requires that the application to vote by mail be sent to everyone in the state who had been registered to vote prior to July 1. It also expands early voting, adding additional days to be able to limit crowds at the polls for those who still wish to vote face-to-face.

Additionally, hawaii has made applications to vote by mail available via down load.

In 2016 and 2018, about 25% of US voters cast ballots by mail, which includes the handful of states that conduct elections entirely by mail and old-fashioned absentee ballots.

Before the Massachusetts bill was signed, people in the state managed to cast their ballots by mail only if absences, physical disabilities or religious beliefs prevented them from voting at their polling places. Now voters can afford to send their ballots via envelope without needing excuses.

For some states, the expansion of voting by mail has been an uphill battle. In Texas, the Democratic Party’s efforts are actually challenged upward to the particular Supreme Court, which has refused an ask for from the celebration to speed up the case, which makes it highly improbable that the concern will be determined in time for your November selection.

President Donald Trump provides lashed out there at authorities in 2 swing says, Michigan plus Nevada, more than their movements to allow it to be easier to get more people to cast ballots by mail ahead of the November election, featuring his increasing anger more than mail-in voting changes which he contends may encourage scams and harm his likelihood of reelection.
The President’s severe and often baseless criticism associated with vote-by-mail is usually significantly ratcheting up as increasingly more states release restrictions within the practice possibly proactively or even on courtroom orders.