Myanmar Army Says it Has Convicted Three Troops For 2017 Massacre of Rohingya

Myanmar’s military said Tuesday that it tried and convicted three soldiers in a secret court-martial for the massacre of hundreds of Rohingya villagers throughout an army-led crackdown in Rakhine state in 2017, only the next case where troops have already been held responsible for atrocities contrary to the Muslim minority.

The verdict on the massacre near Gu Dar Pyin village came as the Myanmar military faces genocide-related charges at three international courts over its expulsion of more than 740,000 Rohingya to Bangladesh in late 2017, where thousands died in indiscriminate killings, mass rape, torture, and village burnings.

In the massive displacement camps in Bangladesh, the refugees told rights groups about atrocities committed against them by soldiers, such as the Aug. 27, 2017, massacre near the Buthidaung township village, where hundreds of bodies were dumped in five mass graves and burned with acid.

According to a statement by the army on the court martial, a high-ranking officer, another officer, and an infantry soldier, whose identities and ranks are not disclosed, were convicted for the mass killing of civilians.

The investigation began in late November 2019, said the statement, which didn’t disclose details of the sentences or the number and names of witnesses called to testify by both plaintiff and the defendants.

RFA could not reach Myanmar military spokesman Brigadier General Zaw Min Tun for touch upon the statement.

The Myanmar military faces genocide-related charges at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) and in a Argentine court over the 2017 mass expulsion of the Rohingya in response to attacks on guard posts by Muslim militants.

Myanmar in testimony to the ICJ this past year denied its troops committed genocide and pointed to military trials as examples that show the country is capable of accountability without outside interference.

Rights groups, however, say the military trial process has delivered no justice for the Rohingya and has been marred by procedural flaws and a lack of transparency.

‘Whole world is watching’

Military authorities didn’t allow villagers and others associated with the case to observe and participate in the court-martial process, said Aung Thaung Shwe, a lower house lawmaker from Buthidaung township. He said he was invited to go to the final day of the tribunal, but was not in a position to go.

Human rights attorney Kyee Myint, who lives in Yangon, said details about the trial should really be issued to the public since the military must present credible information to the international community.

“According to the law, the trial should have been conducted in a transparent manner,” that he told RFA.

“The whole world is watching this technique, [so] it should not be predicated on military secrets,” that he added.

Nickey Diamond, a Myanmar human rights specialist with the Southeast Asia-based NGO Fortify Rights, lamented the secrecy, despite international scrutiny of Myanmar’s pledges to keep the military to take into account abuses.

“The entire process has been done without any transparency,” that he said.

Rohingya Muslim refugee Mohammad Lalmia from the Myanmar village of Gu Dar Pyin in Rakhine state poses for a portrait at the Balukhali refugee camp in southeastern Bangladesh, Jan. 14, 2018.
Credit: Associated Press

No justice for the Rohingya

Rohingya activists said they had deep doubts concerning the court martial process and the outcome.

“This court-martial trial does not bring any justice,” said Khin Maung, an activist who lives in a displacement camp for Rohingya refugees in southeastern Bangladesh.

Soldiers should be sentenced by a civil court beneath the civilian government administration, that he said.

“Only then can we say that justice has been served,” Khin Maung said.

Tun Khin, president of the London-based Burmese Rohingya Organisation UK (BROUK), said he’d no confidence in the sentencing of the guilty soldiers

“These military court martial trials are just superficial actions to alleviate international pressure, so we don’t trust court-martial or the judicial system of Myanmar as a whole,” he said.

Tun Khin said the extent of the military’s crimes against the Rohingya will not be unmasked until an unbiased international investigative commission conducts probes inside Myanmar.

But Aye Lwin, a Muslim community leader, said the court-martial of the three soldiers is better than perhaps not holding one to account.

“They have admitted that the massacre happened,” that he told RFA.

“As I have observed their procedures, they have taken strong and concrete steps,” said Aye Lwin, who once sat on a government advisory commission on resolving the religious and ethnic divisions in Rakhine state.

Military authorities conducted the court of inquiry prior to the hearing and the prosecutor presented evidence to support the accusations, that he added.

“So, we should welcome this as positive sign, but it would be much better if there were transparencies,” Aye Lwin said.

Convicted, but pardoned

In Myanmar’s first court-martial in March 2018, four officers and three soldiers were each sentenced to 10 years in prison for killing a group of Rohingya men in Rakhine’s Inn Din village. The Inn Din incident led to Myanmar’s arrest of two Reuters news agency reporters whose photo essay of the killings went viral.

The troops convicted for the killings in Inn Din were later pardoned after serving less time in jail than the journalists.

This February, the military said it would probe a government-appointed commission’s findings on killings in Maung Nu and Chut Pyin villages, where about 300 civilians are considered to have died at the hands of soldiers throughout “clearance operations.”

In the international courts, the ICC in November authorized the opening of a study into so-called crimes within the tribunal’s jurisdiction committed against Myanmar’s Rohingya.

The ICJ issued provisional measures in January ordering Myanmar to guard the Rohingya from genocidal acts and refrain from destroying evidence of alleged crimes that could be found in later hearings.

The country also must submit periodic reports on its compliance with the measures until the ICJ issues your final decision on the case.

The Argentine court in early June requested more information from the ICC to ensure that its case wouldn’t normally duplicate other judicial efforts.

Reported by RFA’s Myanmar Service. Translated by Ye Kaung Myint Maung. Written in English by Roseanne Gerin.