The Elizabeth Warren-Bernie Sanders feud just got way uglier

That’s the one potential takeaway from the continuing backwards and forwards between Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts over whether or not the previous instructed the latter that he didn’t imagine a girl might be elected president in 2020. And the feud got worse, not higher, throughout — and after — Tuesday evening’s Iowa debate.

“Well, as a matter of fact, I didn’t say it. And I don’t want to waste a whole lot of time on this, because this is what Donald Trump and maybe some of the media want. Anybody who knows me knows that it’s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman cannot be President of the United States.”

Warren was then requested what her response was to what Sanders had stated again in 2018. “I disagreed,” she stated. “Bernie is my friend, and I am not here to try to fight with Bernie. But, look, this question about whether or not a woman can be president has been raised, and it’s time for us to attack it head-on.”

And that was it — till the tip of the controversy. Sanders and Warren approached each other and he caught out his hand. She didn’t shake it. What adopted was a short however clearly uncomfortable dialog. As Sanders’ marketing campaign co-chair Nina Turner put it on CNN: “I’m not sure what she said, but you can read the body language. Obviously, their conversation was not pleasant.”
Uh, yeah. Watch it for your self.
Then the battle turned to social media. As of Wednesday morning, the hashtag “#neverWarren” was trending as Bernie allies took to Twitter to assault the Massachusetts senator as a mendacity snake. (Not kidding; snake emojis have been in all places within the anti-Warren tweets.) “Lie or mischaracterize your ‘friend’s’ comments, double down, refuse to shake his hand,” tweeted Kyle Kulinski, a distinguished liberal and YouTube host. “Are you watching America?” tweeted liberal activist and Sanders supporter Shaun King: “When @BernieSanders beat a Republican to win his congressional seat 29 years ago, Elizabeth Warren was still a Republican. One reason she never lost to a Republican is that she was a Republican for the first 47 years of her life.”
On the opposite aspect of the argument, Third Way senior vice chairman Lanae Erickson tweeted this of the Sanders-Warren handshake-that-wasn’t: “That moment when the dude who called himself a “feminist” on his profile shows his true colors on date 5…You hate to see it.”

There are actual penalties to all of those uncooked emotions. Sanders and Warren are the 2 most distinguished liberals within the race, and for both of them to beat former Vice President Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination this 12 months, they’ll want the near-united help of the left. Up till a number of days in the past, that appeared like a really actual chance, with Warren and Sanders refusing to assault each other and their supporters — on-line and off — largely aiming their rhetorical fireplace on the likes of Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

After Tuesday evening, nonetheless, the thought of the Sanders individuals rallying round Warren if, after the primary few primaries and caucuses, she seems like probably the most viable liberal candidate, now appears fanciful. And, vice versa for the Warren individuals being cool with the thought of Sanders because the liberal alternative for 2020.

And that’s true it doesn’t matter what the 2 principals say (or do not say) about that now-famous December 2018 assembly and/or the no-handshake second in Tuesday evening’s debate. What occurred Tuesday evening appears prone to reverberate not just by means of the Iowa caucuses in 19 days’ time however the broader battle over who emerges because the liberal alternative and whether or not — or not — the left is keen to rally round that individual.



Source link